活在和别人的比较中。

我是群晖 DS224+，好处是不折腾还是很省心的。常见的使用场景默认用就好。

缺点是如果要折腾，原件略拉跨（其实你自己也知道）。我还有一台 MacMini 。发现使用 MacMIni + Samba 映射，效果比群晖好太多。

目前是不折腾的，如果照片文件备份啥的用群晖，docker / k3s 用其它方案。

我就是 13min ，基本不玩游戏，感觉现在还挺好用的。

目前不打算换。

之前买过 PM ，但手太小，拿着很不顺手。

这一切终将过去

换一个吧。

主要是出事后代价太大了。

好聚好散，这种情况我一般会多给半个月的钱。

去内分泌科看下吧，花不了多少钱。

是啊

十年后更难

但再之后生育就直线下跌，怎么样就不知道了

- 能做的，这个关键入场有一定投入。

- 超市一般有自己的解决方案，不一定你能进得去。

- 驾考，影院，机场甚至停车场就要靠自己了。

大家是商业合作关系，商业都进行不下去了，还是不要合作了吧。

- 买个 iPad ，或者小米平板

- 经常陪他出去转转

- 偶尔一起旅游

- 饭后一起散步、聊天

- 一起玩玩游戏，和小区的老人多结交

你都过来问，其实已有动心了吧。

@Davic1 #24
original： https://www.reddit.com/r/macapps/comments/1d87ykz/highly_suggest_to_remove_bartender_5_from_your/
one:

> I would not recommend such protection. You never know what binary will upload anything (usually it is done by another binary to hide the activity, like some python script that is hard to script in rules as all of these are executed as "python").

(it is time for me to switch to other things than monitor this thread :), I will delete this post to avoid any misinformation after any legitimate data)

another:
> Too immature. That's why it's easy to hack someone. If they want to target macOS Guru, they simply deploy some logic like:

Send and receive orders directly with C2 in normal cases

If cannot, write the command and respond to the file and wait for it to ship to C2 from another application that most users will Allow connect to the network. And of course they are also behind that software. Or they can also take advantage of some vulnerable software as a carrier.

In fact, 1001 more complicated ways to achieve the same goal. Host firewall is not a Swiss knife

看了一下 reddit 的稿子，虽然是正版用户，还是默默卸载了。

虽然我有 little snitch 已经关闭这玩意儿的联网权限。但 Reddit 的用户跟贴说这个帮助有限，有很多种方法来绕开。

当前用的 hidden bar, 免费，App Store 。 没有 bar tender 那样好用，先对付着吧。